ED or EH vibration shakers?
- Resonate Systems

- Aug 7
- 2 min read
Updated: Aug 21
Introduction to Vibration Test Systems: Electrodynamic and Electrohydraulic Shakers
Vibration test systems are used extensively in product qualification, research and development, and durability testing. This article introduces and compares two primary technologies:
Electrodynamic (ED) shakers and Electrohydraulic (EH) shakers.
What Is a Vibration Test System?
A vibration test system is designed to apply controlled mechanical vibration to a component or structure, simulating the dynamic loads encountered during transport, operation, or real-world service environments. The goal is to uncover mechanical weaknesses, fatigue points, or resonance-related issues before field deployment.
At its core, the system generates a forced vibration with defined frequency and amplitude. In its simplest form, like a motor with an eccentric cam, the unbalanced mass creates periodic forces. However, modern systems offer far more precision, range, and control.

Electrodynamic Shakers (ED)
Electrodynamic shakers operate on the same Lorentz force principle as loudspeakers. A moving coil (voice coil) is suspended within a static magnetic field generated by permanent magnets or field coils. When an alternating current passes through the coil, a force is generated proportional to the current and the magnetic field. This moves the coil, and the attached armature, back and
forth.

Key characteristics:
Frequency range: Typically 5 Hz to 2,500 Hz or higher
Control: Excellent for sine, random, shock, and classical waveform testing
Cooling: Air or water-cooled options depending on force rating
Applications: Electronics, aerospace components, automotive assemblies, small mechanical parts
The armature (analogous to the speaker cone) serves as the mounting platform for the test item. ED shakers are often used with slip tables (for horizontal excitation), head expanders, and guided fixtures to support a wide variety of test configurations.

Electrohydraulic Shakers (EH)
Electrohydraulic shakers, also known as servo-hydraulic actuators, use pressurised oil to actuate a piston in a two-chamber cylinder. The direction and magnitude of the force are controlled by a servo valve, which rapidly switches the oil flow between chambers.
While derived from the hydraulic systems used in industrial machinery (e.g., excavators), EH shakers are specifically engineered for high-speed dynamic performance.

Key characteristics:
Frequency range: Typically 0.1 Hz to 500 Hz (can vary based on system design)
Stroke capability: Much longer displacement than ED shakers, often over 100 mm peak-to-peak
Force: Suited for high-force applications (100 kN and above)
Applications: Structural testing, civil engineering, vehicle chassis, large assemblies
Due to their high stroke and force capabilities, EH systems are ideal for low-frequency, high-displacement testing such as road simulation, seismic simulation, and structural fatigue assessments.
Which Shaker Should You Choose?
The selection depends on your application needs:
Criteria | Electrodynamic (ED) | Electrohydraulic (EH) |
Frequency range | Mid to high (1 Hz–2.5 kHz+) | Low (0.1–500 Hz) |
Displacement | Typically ≤ 100 mm p-p | Typically ≥ 100 mm p-p |
Force | Up to ~100 kN (typical) | Up to several hundred kN |
Signal fidelity | Excellent | Good for lower frequencies |
Typical applications | Electronics, aerospace | Automotive, structures |
Maintenance | Lower | Higher (hydraulics intensive) |
In many cases, modern testing programs may require both types. For example, ED shakers can address high-frequency fatigue or resonance issues, while EH systems handle long-duration, low-frequency stress tests.
Find out more about:
Data Physics electrodynamic vibration test systems: https://www.resonatesystems.com.au/data-physics-signalforce
EMIC electrodynamic vibration test systems: https://www.resonatesystems.com.au/vibration-test-systems
TEAM electrohydraulic vibration test systems: https://www.resonatesystems.com.au/team-electrohydraulic-test-systems




Comments